- Alpha Release
- Climate Physics is up and running. People involved in these initial weeks are helping us to get a solid start and some initial content ready for an official launch day. Thank you!
- We need people to sign up and add content. Introduce yourself at the Meet and Greet forum. Speak up to welcome a few others. Have a look at the guidelines, then start a thread, or contribute to someone else's thread, in "General discussion" about something frivolous. Give ideas and suggestions and problems in "Feedback". Write about a recent or an important paper in "Published papers". Try your hand at a "Tutorial". And also, if another thread by someone else looks interesting, add something to it!
- We need people to put a bit of work into getting the board active and humming in these early days. You can help off-site as well, by blogging about it, or blogging about an interesting thread.
- There will be a public launch of the new board in late June or early July with some special events. By then the board will hopefully be working spontaneously and we can all relax a bit at a job well done to get it going... and I will remove these distracting notices.
|Ideas or suggestions for Climate Physics forums may be added in the feedback forum without registration.|
If you register as a board member, you will be able to join in discussions in all the main forums, and have many additional features such as customizing your profile, blogging, and personal messages. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features.
Our aim is to support substantive discussion of the science of climate, especially the underlying physics. We focus on ideas that have been published in the conventional scientific literature. This still allows for all kinds of competing ideas to be considered, while hopefully avoiding distraction from ideas that have no credible basis.
|Does sea level rise invalidate the "ocean cycles cause warming" theory?|
|Topic Started: Jun 20 2010, 07:35 PM (442 Views)|
|dorlomin||Jun 20 2010, 07:35 PM Post #1|
The theory that ocean cycles are largely responsible for the recent heating is getting alot of play in certain sections of the internet recently. I have been countering this with the challange that a body releasing heat cannot be simultaneously expanding due to thermal expansion.
Is this correct or have I been getting it wrong?
|SkyHunter||Jun 22 2010, 03:01 AM Post #2|
This is a typical example of how many misinterpret evidence. Ocean cycles are the dominant short term climate drivers. However, if they were giving up more energy than they were absorbing, sea levels would not be rising at the rate they are.
Good luck with your argument. It has been my experience that if someone has already made up their mind, no amount of evidence will convince them otherwise.
|svatli||Jun 22 2010, 11:22 PM Post #3|
Just to add to this discussion... I don't think that an argument made on a websites (or other places) which is based on misinterpretation is totally wasted. My argument for this is, that there are some readers out there who are able to make up their mind based on solid arguments, therefor it's important to keep on making comments on those kind of websites. You will not necessary get through to those with their mind already convinced, but there is a chance you'll get the message to some of the readers who haven't had the opportunity to see the other side of the argument or for some other reason are trying to figure things out on those websites (which in some cases are set up in a "scientific" way).
So perhaps there is a chance to get to people by this way, otherwise we wouldn't be bothered...or what
|SkyHunter||Jun 24 2010, 02:47 AM Post #4|
I totally agree. I was not suggesting that dorlomin stop arguing, just not to expect tochange any minds. But as you point out, those looking to learn can benefit from the proper reply/response to specious arguments on various websites.
Edited by SkyHunter, Jun 24 2010, 02:48 AM.
|0 users reading this topic|
|« Previous Topic · Climate science discussion · Next Topic »|